LSC-Virgo Burst Analysis Working Group

Navigation

Burst Group Home
Wiki
ExtTrig Home
CBC Group Home
LSC, LIGO, Virgo

Documents

'How-to' docs
Agendas/minutes
[2008, 2007, earlier]
Talks/Posters [pre-wiki]
Papers
Paper plans
White papers
ViewCVS

Investigations

Analysis projects
Old notebook [General, S2, S3, S4, S5]
Virgo workarea
External collabs

Review

Main review page
Telecons

S5 LIGO-Only Untriggered Review Summary

Review of the first year of S5

Data sets and DQ segments

Cross-check of the pipeline sensitivity

Patrick Sutton has been modifying his scripts from the S4 LIGO-GEO review to model the sensitivity of cWB in the first year of S5.

Loud triggers

Missed Injections

Reconstruction of trigger parameters

GWDAW 11, December 2006

All-Sky Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts during the fifth LIGO Science Run

We reviewed the slides [ PDF, PPT ]. There are minor changes we feel should be made to this presentation prior to final approval. We recommend provisional approval of this presentation pending resolution of the remaining issues identified by the review committee. These issues are:
  1. Removal of zero-time-shift result points.
  2. Correction of definition of hrss

These items have been resolved in Version 2 of the presentation [ PDF, PPT ]. We recommend final approval of this presentation.


Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data

We reviewed the slides [ PDF, PPT ]. There are some changes we feel should be made to this presentation and some results that we have not yet approved. We recommend provisional approval of this presentation pending resolution of the remaining issues identified by the review committee and the approval of certain results by the code review committee. These issues are:
  1. Visual indication that results are for timeshifted data in various places.
  2. Efficiency curves and values have not yet been approved by the code review team. They need to be approved or removed.

These items have been resolved in Version 3 of the presentation [ PDF, PPT ]. We recommend final approval of this presentation.

Texas Symposium, December 2006

We reviewed the slide [ PPT ]. We recommend approval of this slide for presentation.

APS April Meeting 2006

We reviewed the slides [ PDF ]. We recommend approval of this presentation. There were some minor issues that we have not yet resolved:

Prior to the March LSC Meeting 2006 we reviewed these slides [ PDF ]. Here was the review summary at that time:

$Id: summary.html,v 1.8 2008/07/25 10:55:47 psutton Exp $